Skip to content
Back to work

Case study · Client product

Dema IQ: the screening result you can prove.

Dema IQ gives Namibian institutions one place to screen a name against the PIP register and UN sanctions list, then keeps a dated, verifiable certificate of each check.

Sector
Compliance screening · regtech
Product
PIP and sanctions screening
Engagement
Client product · v1 build

The problem

Global screening lists leave a local blind spot.

A global provider can search a Namibian name and return no match. That answer is only as good as the provider's local coverage, and local coverage is often the missing part.

Compliance teams

Global screening lists can return nothing for a Namibian name even when a local public appointment exists.

Accountable institutions

Banks, legal practices, estate agents, and other FIA-listed institutions still need to screen the people in front of them.

Auditors & regulators

A result needs a record of who searched, when they searched, which list they used, and what came back.

A clean "nothing found" result means very little if the source never covered the market properly. The product had to make the coverage and the evidence part of the answer.

Before · the paper trail

  • Namibian PIP register.xlsx
  • “No match” (global screening list)
  • UN sanctions check (screenshot)
  • Proof of screening? (email)

Registers, screenshots, and proof-of-screening requests left the institution to assemble its own audit trail.

What shipped

One screening path, with the evidence built in.

The first version joins the full operating path. A team chooses its lists, searches a name, reviews the strongest evidence, records its decision, and keeps the certificate.

Dema IQ · screening walkthrough
  1. 01

    Choose lists

  2. 02

    Search a name

  3. 03

    Review evidence

  4. 04

    Record a decision

  5. 05

    Keep the certificate

Hard decisions

The hard part was making every answer defensible.

Compliance software cannot hide behind a confidence score. A reviewer needs to see what the system found, understand why it reached that finding, and prove later that the check happened.

01

Local coverage stays current

Dema IQ maintains the Namibian PIP coverage behind each answer. The institution can screen names without building or updating its own register.

02

Evidence comes before certainty

A possible match includes the appointment, dates, status, and source evidence. The product gives the reviewer facts instead of pretending a name alone settles identity.

03

The two lists stay separate

PIP and UN sanctions checks can run together, but each returns its own finding and certificate. The records never blur into one answer.

04

Proof outlives the session

Every search issues a dated certificate with a verification code. An auditor or regulator can check it later without needing a Dema IQ account.

Outcome

A Namibian answer, with the evidence attached.

Namibian PIP and UN sanctions checks in one search, with evidence-backed results and a verifiable certificate for every screen.

See it live at dema-iq.com
  • Teams can run Namibian PIP and UN sanctions checks from the same screen.
  • Each result explains the finding and carries the source evidence needed for review.
  • Every screen produces a dated certificate that a third party can verify without an account.

Next step

Got a product hiding inside a messy workflow?

Bring the idea, spec, or workflow into Product Proof Week. You leave with a v1 scope, working proof, feasibility verdict, and fixed quote.